Showing posts with label Cole Aldrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cole Aldrich. Show all posts

Monday, March 11, 2013

NBA News 2013: Learning From The Kings' Thomas Robinson Mistake

DeMarcus Cousins at the Drew League/Goodman Le...
DeMarcus Cousins at the Drew League/Goodman League basketball game in August 2011 in Washington, DC. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Coming into this year’s draft, Thomas Robinson was considered one of the most “NBA ready” prospects available. An athletic 6’9 240 forward coming off an All-American season at Kansas, he had a defensive position (the 4) and a skill (rebounding) that would immediately translate to the next level. But while Robinson’s collegiate statistics were eye-popping, the holes in his game meant he would only be effective in a limited number of roles in the NBA, at least initially. The Sacramento Kings passed on several players with substantially higher upsides to make the “win now” selection in Robinson; eight months later, they dealt him to the Rockets for pennies on the dollar.

In a draft where Damian Lillard went No. 6 and Andre Drummond went No. 9, you would like to get a little more out of the No. 5 pick than Patrick Patterson, Toney Douglas and Cole Aldrich. Patterson has some value as an undersized stretch 4, but he’s a role player in his third season set to become much more expensive in the near future. With more talented players behind him in Houston, the Rockets would have been looking to give him away this summer. And while Robinson will be a more useful player in Kevin McHale’s uptempo system, he will probably never be a frontline starter. When the Kings selected him, they were thinking short when they should have been thinking long.

From an on-court perspective, Robinson didn’t make much sense for the Kings. DeMarcus Cousins is a low-post center who can’t protect the rim, so his ideal frontcourt partner is a shot-blocking power forward who can space the floor from the three-point line. It would be hard to find a worse fit than Robinson, an undersized big man without a consistent perimeter shot. Instead of making each other better, they made each other worse: they couldn’t co-exist defensively or get out of the other’s way on offense. As a result, with Cousins averaging 31 minutes a night, Robinson slowly slipped out of the rotation.

He will have a better chance to showcase his game with the Rockets. Rather than running an offense built around a post scorer, the Rockets spread the floor and attack with a barrage of pick-and-rolls. Robinson’s speed and finishing ability make him an excellent roll man and the four-out offense creates a lot of room for him to attack the basket. Not only is he now on the receiving end of James Harden’s passes, their breakneck pace (No. 1 in the NBA) gives him more chances in the open court. He’s more effective in transition, where he can use his speed and athleticism to his advantage, than in the halfcourt, where his lack of skill can be easily exploited.

All that said, Houston isn’t a perfect fit for him either. Since he can’t consistently knock down a perimeter jumper, it’s hard to play him and Omer Asik at the same time. The Rockets' offense is based around spacing the floor, and neither Robinson nor Asik can make a defense pay for leaving them open 15 feet from the rim. Asik is the only thing preventing their defense from collapsing in on itself like a neutron star, meaning Robinson will have to learn to shoot to play 30+ minutes a night with Houston. With the Kings, he had a 34% effective field goal percentage outside of 10 feet. Right now, he is best used as a small-ball 5, which means that if another team has a quality 6’10+ post scorer who can punish his lack of size down low, it’s going to be hard to find him minutes.

Developing an outside shot will be crucial for Robinson’s career. Since he’s unlikely to ever develop into an elite shot-creator, either with his back to the basket or off the bounce, a consistent jumper is the only way he can play as a power forward. When he plays as a 4, he can use his lateral quickness to defend in space on the perimeter; when he plays as a 5, he has to be an interior defensive presence and a rim protector. In college, he only averaged 0.87 blocks a game and outsourced defensive responsibility to Jeff Withey. That’s not going to work in the NBA, particularly when his skill-set demands a more offensive-minded big man next to him. He’ll have a long pro career regardless, but he’ll be a third big man if he doesn’t become more skilled offensively.

Robinson may have been more NBA ready than many of his peers, but that really isn’t saying all that much. For 99 percent of rookies, the first year in the league is mostly about survival. Not only have they just received a life-changing amount of money, but they have to become accustomed to the grind of an 82-game schedule. Players from BCS conferences might see an NBA-caliber player at their position once or twice a month; in the NBA, they match-up with multiple NBA-caliber players every single night. Their heads are spinning so fast that it seems unfair to even ask them to learn the complicated help-side defensive principles they never had to bother with in college.

If a team is depending on a rookie to be a foundation piece, they aren’t going to be very good. If they need a first-year player to be a complementary piece, he won’t be the one who pushes them over the top. There are situations where a rookie can fill a minor role on an elite team, like when the Heat drafted Norris Cole to match-up with smaller second-unit PG’s in 2011. Even if there was a higher-upside player on the board, Miami made the correct decision in taking a guy who gave them minutes in the NBA Finals as a rookie. However, for the most, there’s really no reason to draft a player based on what they are going to do in their first year.

When a player reaches the end of their rookie contract, what they’ll be able to do as they enter the prime of their careers is far more important than what they’ve done at the beginning. Coming out of UCLA in 2009, Darren Collison and Jrue Holiday both slipped in the draft. Holiday fell to No. 17 because he was many years away from his ceiling; Collison fell to No. 21 because there were questions about how high his ceiling was. Four years later, Holiday is an All-Star and Collison is falling out of favor with his third different team. Does it matter if Collison was a substantially better player in their rookie season?

Before this year’s draft, everyone acted like Andre Drummond was the biggest gamble on the board because of the lack of polish in his game. In reality, the real gamble was passing on a 6’11 270 monster with his type of freakish athleticism. If Sacramento had taken Drummond, he could have formed one of the biggest front-lines in the NBA and perhaps even made Cousins expendable down-the-road. Because the learning curve for rookies is so steep, drafting players is like shopping for a new car: they lose half their value once you take them off the lot. And if you go into the draft expecting that they will all need time to develop, you might as well take someone who can develop into something special when you get the chance.

http://basketball.realgm.com/article/226557/Learning-From-The-Kings-Thomas-Robinson-Mistake

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, February 23, 2013

NBA News 2013: Thomas Robinson Traded To Rockets

English: Patrick Patterson following a game ag...
English: Patrick Patterson following a game against Clarion University (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Reuniting the Morris twins marked an unusual starting shot to the trade deadline and was immediately followed by a much bigger deal also involving the Rockets. Considering the fact that the trades were done concurrently (and likely will become a three-way when it hits the league office) I will evaluate it as such.

The Rockets' Perspective

I had been critical of Daryl Morey and the Rockets brass since the Draft because they had a stockpile of not that special power forward and not enough time to play them all. Well, that just got emphatically clarified. Losing Toney Douglas and Cole Aldrich makes them slightly shallower at those spots for this season, but means nearly nothing to the team moving forward. As such, it becomes a simpler trade for the future.

Effectively moving Patrick Patterson for Thomas Robinson (and some pieces) absolutely makes a ton of sense for a team that has had plenty of time to evaluate Patterson and his fit with what they have. Robinson has a ton of potential and possesses the additional benefit of two extra years of team control (Patterson hits restricted free agency in 2014 and Robinson in 2016). Losing Marcus Morris for a 2013 second round pick may make people balk but the net moves save the team about $1.5 million for next season, marking a necessary sacrifice for a team in the free agency sweepstakes this summer.

On top of that, I am intrigued to see what Houston does with Francisco Garcia and Tyler Honeycutt, who could absolutely contribute to a team set at the starting perimeter spots but lacking somewhat when it comes to swingman depth.

All in all, Houston made a smart trade of Patrick Patterson for Thomas Robinson while picking up some interesting assets and some valuable salary space for the 2013-14 season in the process. Well done.

Grade for Houston: A-

The Kings' Perspective

I like Patrick Patterson but worry that the difference in years under rookie deals could end up hurting Sacramento relatively soon. After all, having a player closer to his peak makes remarkably little sense for a team who should not be looking to win the rest of this season and likely cannot make much noise next year. He could help try [emphasis on try] to stabilize former Kentucky teammate DeMarcus Cousins, but that is not enough of a benefit to outweigh the other costs. Now is far too early to give up on Thomas Robinson, especially when doing so for a guy who helps them more at a less valuable time in the team’s progression.

The other issue I have with the deal is that Cole Aldrich will be an Unrestricted Free Agent this summer by virtue of his option year being declined, while Toney Douglas will be Restricted but is not that good and plays a position where the Kings actually do not need help from a rotation player. Trading a swingman like Garcia who can actually shoot could be a problem as well though it’s not too big a deal.

Grade for Sacramento: D+

The Suns' Perspective

Trading a solid second round pick for a talented enough guy like Marcus Morris is fine. I personally love early seconds (since they are so cheap), but Morris has enough time on his deal and fit with Phoenix to make it a reasonable choice.

Grade for Phoenix: B

http://basketball.realgm.com/article/226251/Grading-The-Deal-Thomas-Robinson-Traded-To-Rockets

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, October 29, 2012

NBA News 2012: Harden trade shows it’s all about the money

James Harden, Serge Ibaka, Victor Claver, and ...
James Harden, Serge Ibaka, Victor Claver, and Pau Gasol (Photo credit: ctsnow)

In professional sports, it’s often about the money. And at the end of the day, the Oklahoma City Thunder didn’t have the money for guard James Harden.

So late Saturday, the Thunder, who lost to the Miami Heat in five games in last season’s NBA Finals, traded Harden to the Houston Rockets for guards Kevin Martin and Jeremy Lamb, two first-round picks and second-round pick. The Rockets received center Cole Aldrich, guard Daequan Cook and forward Lazar Hayward in the deal.

Harden, the 2011-12 sixth man of the year and a London Olympics gold medalist with Team USA, and the Thunder had been involved in talks about an extension, but the two sides could not find common ground. Instead of risk losing Harden as a restricted free agent after the 2012-13 season, the Thunder decided to make sure they got something in return.

“While I never like having to send out quality players like Kevin Martin and Jeremy Lamb, this trade gives us a chance to make an immediate impact on the future of our franchise moving forward,” Rockets owner Leslie Alexander said in a statement. “James Harden was part of Team USA’s gold medal team at the London Olympics and is one of the most skilled shooting guards in the NBA. James, along with the mix of young players we already have in place such as (guard) Jeremy Lin, (forward) Chandler Parsons and (center) Omer Asik give us a very solid group of young, talented players who will form the core of our team.”

The deal cuts to the heart of the plight of small- and mid-market teams such as the Thunder. Can they return all of their top players? Are they willing to have a payroll that surpasses the luxury tax and are they willing to pay the tax when they go over? The Thunder have more than $200 million tied up in salary for forward Kevin Durant, guard Russell Westbrook and forward Serge Ibaka through 2016-17.

Just before midnight ET, Durant tweeted, “Wow.”

http://www.hoopsworld.com/james-harden-trade-by-thunder-shows-its-all-about-the-money/

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, October 28, 2012

NBA News 2012: Oklahoma City Thunder trade should benefit Lakers

English: James Harden, a player for the Oklaho...
English: James Harden, a player for the Oklahoma City Thunder at ARCO Arena. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Oklahoma City Thunder and Houston Rockets pulled off a late offseason trade on Saturday that sent James Harden, Cole Aldrich, Daequan Cook and Lazar Hayward to the Houston Rockets for Kevin Martin, Jeremy Lamb and draft considerations.

Harden was a major factor in knocking the Lakers out of the postseason last May.

The move for the Thunder was more about economics than basketball.  The new collective-bargaining agreement includes increasingly punitive luxury taxes and Oklahoma City is already heavily invested in Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka.

The move will probably benefit the Lakers should the two meet again in the postseason.

Harden is a capable shooter and defender. In the playoffs against the Lakers, he was able to drive into the paint to either score or draw a foul.  Certainly the Lakers will have their hands full with Durant and Westbrook in the future, but Harden seemed to be the difference-maker in the series.

On paper, the Lakers have improved over last year, with the additions of Steve Nash, Dwight Howard, Jodie Meeks and Antawn Jamison.  Of course, the Lakers have to prove they can win even a single game after dropping all eight in the preseason.

Injuries have slowed the team's development, but the Lakers will round into form as they get healthy and grow more comfortable in Coach Mike Brown's offense.

The Thunder are still a major threat.  Martin can also shoot and get to the line, but he's not close to Harden as a defender or playmaker. Lamb's game is actually similar to Martin's, although he's younger and more athletic.

In the short term, it would appear the Thunder have taken a step backward.  If the Lakers can come together and stay healthy, the road through the Western Conference might have gotten slightly easier.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, September 13, 2010

NBA News 2010: Which team is the strongest Western Conference challenger?

Greg Oden promotes literacy and the manga &quo...Image via Wikipedia
Which Western Conference team has the best chance to beat the Lakers in a seven-game series? 

The Results: 

Oklahoma City- 5.5 votes 
Portland- 3.5 votes 
Dallas- 2 votes 
Houston- 1 vote, but a lot of love as a serious dark horse 
Nobody- 1 vote 

My Take: Two teams -- Oklahoma City and Portland -- stand out. Both have the ability to make life difficult for the Lakers. A healthy Blazers team has backcourt strength (Brandon Roy), a stong wing defender (Nicolas Batum) and frontcourt depth (Greg Oden, LaMarcus Aldridge, Marcus Camby, plus Joel Przybilla, if he recovers from knee surgery). We saw last season what OKC was capable of, and if the Thunder get decent play from Cole Aldrich and more development from Serge Ibaka (thus beefing up the frontcourt), I'll give them the slightest of edges over Portland, probably because it's hard for me to picture a healthy Portland team. 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

NBA News 2010: How Far Will the Oklahoma City Thunder Go in the Playoffs?

Russell Westbrook took an elbow to the eye tha...Image via Wikipedia
Undeterred by their shortcomings against the Lakers, the Thunder added Morris Peterson, Daequan Cook and Cole Aldrich through trades, giving themselves a few more sharpshooters from the wing and an extra big body down low. 

The Thunder have the advantage of having the NBA's scoring champion in their corner, and the Thunder will continue living or dying based on Kevin Durant's play. If the role players around Durant—Russell Westbrook, James Harden, Jeff Green, Serge Ibaka, most particularly—can continue building upon their young games, the Thunder could end up challenging the Lakers a few rounds later in the playoffs this season.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, August 20, 2010

NBA News 2010: 7 curious things about the upcoming season

Dwyane Wade of the Miami Heat (in black) dribb...Image via WikipediaThe basketball in Miami
The concentration of talent in Miami has created a dramatic storyline the NBA hasn't seen in years. In late October, the narrative will finally give way to live basketball, as the offseason machinations fade into the background. Fans and observers can debate whether a team of LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh in Miami is healthy for the NBA, and the Heat's first final-possession scenario will likely launch silly arguments about who rightfully deserves to be called "the man" in Miami. Lost in the cacophony of hysteria is the single most fascinating question headed into the 2010-11 season: What will the Miami Heat's 94 or so possessions look like on a nightly basis? How will James play off Wade and vice versa? How do you defend a Wade-James pick-and-roll? Will we see a lineup of Eddie House, Wade, Miller, James and Bosh (talk about the end of positional orthodoxy!)? Will Bosh benefit from the disproportionate attention opposing defenses will have to devote to the perimeter? And how will Bosh handle the more workaday duties of being the big man down low? However you feel about what's transpired since the beginning of July, the experiment being assembled in Miami is a basketball lover's dream. If you find Miami's personnel unlikable, then root like hell for the opposing defense. Either way, you won't be disappointed.
The blueprint in Oklahoma City
The Thunder emerged last season as the most promising young outfit in the NBA. They finished with 50 wins and gave the Lakers their toughest Western Conference playoff series. Then, this offseason, they extended a max contract to Kevin Durant and fortified their bright young core by adding Morris Peterson, Daequan Cook and first-round draft pick Cole Aldrich. In some sense, general manager Sam Presti's decision to essentially stand pat might have been one of the the boldest move of the offseason. Many executives with a talented core and some money to spend would've committed to a high-dollar addition, but Presti stayed the course. He's banking that the maturation of Durant, Russell Westbrook, Jeff Green, James Harden and Serge Ibaka will continue and vault the Thunder over of the scrum in the Western Conference. Is he being realistic? Can the Thunder ride a frontcourt of Green, Nenad Krstic, Ibaka, Nick Collison and Aldrich into the ranks of the NBA elite? Can a team that sustained no major injuries last season decline to add a single major pieces and still pick up 5-10 wins? The answer to these questions will give us an idea of how much "upward trajectory" is worth in the NBA.
Enhanced by Zemanta