Showing posts with label Paul Millsap. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Millsap. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

NBA News 2013: Spurs Could Trade For Al Jefferson

Spurs logo 2002–present
Spurs logo 2002–present (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The San Antonio Spurs are the frontrunners to acquire Al Jefferson, according to a report.

Jefferson will be an unrestricted free agent this offseason and the Utah Jazz are unlikely to re-sign them.

“Those teams are practically incestuous, they are on such good terms internally,” one NBA source said.

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/225982/Report-Spurs-Could-Trade-For-Al-Jefferson

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

NBA News 2012: Millsap Extension Talks Happening With Utah

Paul Millsap of Utah JazzPaul Millsap of Utah Jazz (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Anybody who’s spent any time watching the Utah Jazz over the course of the last year knows that the future of that team lies in the kids. The young frontcourt of Gordon Hayward, Derrick Favors, and Enes Kanter has looked very, very promising at times, and had the Jazz not surprised everyone by making the playoffs last year, the youth movement may have been given the green light in Salt Lake City for 2012-2013.

Instead, Utah looks as committed as ever to Paul Millsap, whose contract expires next summer. Instead of exploring the idea of trading him or letting him walk so Favors can bloom, Millsap and the Jazz have reportedly already begun talking about an extension, according to the Salt Lake Tribune.

The deal on the table is for three years with 7.5% increases in salary each year of the contract, and while that sounds like it would be a great deal for the average American, a player as good as Millsap might deserve more. Remember, his $8 million-per-season (on average) deal has been one of the best bargains in basketball the last three years, so even with the raises a new, three-year deal starting in 2013-2014 would only top out at around $25 million based on his 2012-2013 salary of $7.2 million.

So, perhaps unsurprisingly, Millsap and his camp aren’t showing much interest in the offer. They think—and rightfully so—that he could earn more as a free agent in the summer of 2013, and really nobody’s going to argue with that. He could. And should.

But the really interesting thing about all of this is the fact that Utah is trying to extend him at all. It’s not that they should let him go in free agency without pulling back any assets in return. He is, after all, Utah’s best player. But with Favors finally starting to come into his own, the time is approaching—and much sooner than four years from now, when Millsap’s hypothetical new deal would expire—where he’s going to want his own opportunity to start and thrive for the Jazz.

So there’s at least an outside chance that these talks are taking place right now as a formality to show Millsap appreciation for everything he’s done for the franchise. They must know he’s more valuable than the $8.33 million a season he’d earn in that new deal, and they can’t be shocked to hear he’d rather let the market dictate his value a year from now.

The real question, though, is whether they really plan to keep Millsap through 2016, and what that means for Favors. Millsap isn’t so old that he couldn’t grow with the rest of the young core, and NBA common sense says that sometimes it’s definitely smarter to keep the established NBA player rather than ship him off and hope the kid with potential blossoms into something comparable or better.

It doesn’t always happen that way, so maybe the long-term plan is to keep Millsap since he’s a known commodity, and if Favors really does start to look ready to start, maybe he’s the one who gets traded instead. It would be far from silliest thing an NBA organization could ever do, and many would even applaud such a direction.

In either case, Utah is putting down the ground work to keep Paul Millsap a member of the Jazz, but it’s going to be about a year before fans know whether that ground work pays off.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

NBA News 2010: Jazz Replace Boozer With Jefferson

Minnesota Timberwolves New UniformsImage by Doug Wallick via FlickrThe Jazz and Wolves made a simple trade on Tuesday, exchanging Al Jefferson for two future first round picks, a former first round pick in Kosta Koufos and a traded player exception.
But the trade gets more interesting when we play retroactive GM and realize the Jazz essentially swapped Carlos Boozer (along with what was sent to Minnesota) for Jefferson. The contract Jefferson is under is more affordable annually and is also shorter in length, plus he is several years younger.
For the Wolves, they have now essentially sent Kevin Garnett to the Celtics for Jonny Flynn (their own pick back from the Wally Szczerbiak trade), Wayne Ellington, Koufos, Martell Webster and two more additional picks. It is a whole collection of assets that conceivably could have instead been Stephen Curry and DeJuan Blair, but it is certainly a forewarning to the Hornets as they continue to internally debate whether or not to trade Chris Paul.
Conversely, a preemptive strike such as what Minnesota accomplished with Garnett and Utah did not do with Boozer almost always elicits a better return.
The Cavaliers and Heat each received as much for LeBron James and Chris Bosh, respectively, as the Wolves did for Jefferson. At the very least, it is a feather of some degree in David Kahn's hat, even if it is not an analogous comparison.
Kahn might have drafted two point guards in Flynn and Ricky Rubio, plus signed a third in Ramon Sessions during this first couple of months on the job, but he at least did not draft a second power forward when the old regime picked up Kevin Love. The trade for Love was a good one, as it shifted around some assets and he was the better prospect for Minnesota than O.J. Mayo, but it did create this roster imbalance. Not to discredit Love, but drafting Brook Lopez, who did appear to be their preferred pick at various times would have made life infinitely less complicated.
Minnesota knew they had to trade either Jefferson or Love and they absolutely made the correct decision. Right off the top, Love is younger and cheaper than Jefferson, plus I believe he is ultimately the superior player.
There was the pipe dream of trading Jefferson for someone like Danny Granger, but that was always unrealistic. I thought they could eventually do well by dealing him for someone a little less established, but his injury concerns, somewhat burdensome contract and the limited way he impacts a game.
Defensively and as a passer, Jefferson doesn't offer his team very much. He is a true power forward, but he is capable of being a big body of resistance in the paint against bigger offensive players, even if the resistance is relatively useless.
For the Jazz, acquiring Jefferson one week after losing Boozer at least allows them to sustain their 09-10 level of play for the remainder of Deron Williams' contract. As much as this franchise will ever appease a player, remaining committed to doing everything within their power to keep Williams content with the situation is an imperative given how valuable he is to their continued success. The Jazz are in a better situation than the Hornets are with Chris Paul, but they were another backtrack move or two away having Williams become more vocal with displeasure.
This move does once again murk up Paul Millsap's role with the team. Do the Jazz go small and start both Millsap and Jefferson, or do they remain more conventional?
Furthermore, the logic of passing on Ed Davis and Patrick Patterson in favor of Gordon Hayward becomes more clear in light of the Jefferson acquisition. I had both of those power forwards rated higher than Hayward, plus the need for a replacement for Boozer seemed like an inevitability.
Grade for Jazz: B-
Ultimately, this trade was one both teams had to make because the alternatives were unattractive, even if this doesn't feel great. The Jazz could ill-afford to begin the season without bringing in a replacement for Boozer's production and Jefferson's trade value wasn't going to increase when the season began and Kahn would be forced into increasing his desperation.
Grade for Wolves: B+
http://jazz.realgm.com/articles/43/20100714/grading_the_deal_jazz_replace_boozer_with_jefferson/
Enhanced by Zemanta