Image via WikipediaOn Tuesday afternoon, seventh-year swingman Matt Barnes was officially introduced as the Los Angeles Lakers' latest free agent acquisition—another one of the many magician-like moves general manager Mitch Kupchak has pulled out of his hat; this one of the discounted two-year, $3.6 million variety.
The signing of Barnes cements L.A.'s last major crack on its relatively new-look roster, a roster that is expected to have as few as five new names on it when training camp commences in late September.
What's more, is it supplements the team's defensive-minded, tough-guy mentality, which allowed the Lakers to capture their second NBA championship in as many seasons just last month.
Barnes's ability to play both the shooting guard and small forward positions will alleviate the heavy load of minutes that Kobe Bryant has carried throughout his 14-year career.
The aging Ron Artest will also benefit from longer breathers, especially if he continues to pursue a secondary career in rapping.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/426083-why-cant-we-be-friends-los-angeles-lakers-sign-problematic-matt-barnes
One-stop site of NBA sports news and major sports events within and outside of Philippines
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
NBA News 2010: LeBron James vs. Kobe Bryant: Can We Even Have This Debate?
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeCan we even have this discussion, debating who is the NBA’s best player between LeBron James and Kobe Bryant?
On the surface, the answer is a resounding no.
That’s because there is a clear winner. The personal scoreboard reads 5 to 0, in Kobe Bryant’s favor. For many fans, that makes all the difference, regardless of personal stats or regular season hardware.
And, let’s dispense right out the gate with the usual arguments. We all know them by heart. Kobe has better players around him. Or, put LeBron on the Lakers and watch what happens. Or, send Kobe to Cleveland and see if he even makes the playoffs.
All possibly valid points but really, haven’t they been beaten to death?
In the end, the cold hard fact is that the equation for the best player breaks down like this:
Talent + Rings = Greatness.
Fair or unfair, fortunately or unfortunately, that’s how it works, that’s how great players are judged.
All the legends have applied that formula. Kobe uses it today. And, given time, LeBron will, too.
But the real question to ask when comparing both Kobe and LeBron is this: Are they even an original, or simply a Xerox copy of legend?
Let’s face it, Kobe is basically a China knock-off of Michael Jordan, and LeBron James is the closest thing to Magic Johnson the league has seen in 30 years.
In the case of Kobe, his copy of MJ is almost identical, you have to look really hard to see the differences. It’s like looking at two photos side by side and searching for what has been moved.
Kobe’s resume speaks for itself. 81 points. 5 rings. Shaq glory and feud. Kobe’s been in our consciousness now since 1996. He was the fresh young star, the league’s new hope to replace Michael Jordan, fell from grace, and has risen like a phoenix again.
LeBron will win a ring in his career. Kobe’s not out of his prime yet, but age will catch up. No matter what. And, when it does, LeBron will benefit the most.
Their careers don’t overlap enough for Kobe to stand in LeBron’s way his entire career, like Michael Jordan did to Charles Barkley or Karl Malone. Kobe will retire long before LeBron.
That alone will probably allow LeBron to raise a championship trophy. Sure, there are Kevin Durant, Rajon Rondo, and who knows who else that will come up. But only Rondo has what Kobe has: killer instinct.
And that intensity is what truly sets Kobe part from James, from everyone else, for that matter.
LeBron is amazing, the best big player since Magic Johnson. If LeBron would develop a post-up game, a big man’s game in the paint, he would literally be unstoppable.
But when you look at Kobe, you see Michael.
Kobe’s got the same game, plays in the same triangle offense, and is now only one ring away from matching His Airness.
And, Kobe’s demeanor, work ethic, and drive are not just “Like Mike’s” but could almost be stronger, bordering on obsession, chasing both MJ and greatness.
In the opposite corner, LeBron right now is simply a poor-quality scan of Magic.
Sure, LeBron James is a one-of-a-kind player, the likes the NBA has never seen. At 260 pounds, the man is massive. In a different era, he would have played power forward. He can leap out of the building, can run like a point guard, and finishes near the rim like a legendary dunker.
LBJ also has improved his game in his seven years in the league. His range has increased, as has his accuracy.
He also learned to be a leader in Cleveland and carried his team to best record in the regular season, as well as taking his team to the NBA Finals.
While LeBron’s speed on the perimeter, explosiveness around the basket, and overall game differs from the point guard Magic, the new Heat player passes much like the Laker Legend and looks to involve his teammates in a similar fashion.
If LeBron really is Magic and could get up and down the court anything like the old Showtime Lakers from the 1980’s, it would be crazy time no matter what team the King reigned over.
But the real difference between these two great players is that Kobe has a Gladiator mentality. Hadarii Jones, a Featured Columnist here at the B/R, said it best in a recent article. “Kobe is a dying breed.”
The backlash that has swarmed the King after his decision to leave Cleveland for Miami is like a rainstorm in Seattle that never ends. And, from all angles, LeBron has been hit, from peers to legends.
The focus is all about LeBron’s heart, his will to win, and his ability to be “The Man” on his own team, not to partner with other greats.
The zinger that has stung the most was from Michael Jordan himself.
After a recent golf tourney, MJ said, “There's no way, with hindsight, I would've ever called up Larry, called up Magic and said, 'Hey, look, let's get together and play on one team.
"But that's...things are different. I can't say that's a bad thing. It's an opportunity these kids have today. In all honesty, I was trying to beat those guys."
Those comments from MJ are going to haunt LeBron for a very long time, at least until he wins multiple rings.
But the legend disappointment over LeBron’s decision didn’t stop there. Charles Barkley told the Arizona Republic last week, "Mike and I are in 100 percent agreement on this. If you're the two-time defending NBA MVP, you don't leave anywhere. They come to you. That's ridiculous.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/425503-lebron-james-vs-kobe-bryant-can-we-even-have-this-debate
On the surface, the answer is a resounding no.
That’s because there is a clear winner. The personal scoreboard reads 5 to 0, in Kobe Bryant’s favor. For many fans, that makes all the difference, regardless of personal stats or regular season hardware.
And, let’s dispense right out the gate with the usual arguments. We all know them by heart. Kobe has better players around him. Or, put LeBron on the Lakers and watch what happens. Or, send Kobe to Cleveland and see if he even makes the playoffs.
All possibly valid points but really, haven’t they been beaten to death?
In the end, the cold hard fact is that the equation for the best player breaks down like this:
Talent + Rings = Greatness.
Fair or unfair, fortunately or unfortunately, that’s how it works, that’s how great players are judged.
All the legends have applied that formula. Kobe uses it today. And, given time, LeBron will, too.
But the real question to ask when comparing both Kobe and LeBron is this: Are they even an original, or simply a Xerox copy of legend?
Let’s face it, Kobe is basically a China knock-off of Michael Jordan, and LeBron James is the closest thing to Magic Johnson the league has seen in 30 years.
In the case of Kobe, his copy of MJ is almost identical, you have to look really hard to see the differences. It’s like looking at two photos side by side and searching for what has been moved.
Kobe’s resume speaks for itself. 81 points. 5 rings. Shaq glory and feud. Kobe’s been in our consciousness now since 1996. He was the fresh young star, the league’s new hope to replace Michael Jordan, fell from grace, and has risen like a phoenix again.
LeBron will win a ring in his career. Kobe’s not out of his prime yet, but age will catch up. No matter what. And, when it does, LeBron will benefit the most.
Their careers don’t overlap enough for Kobe to stand in LeBron’s way his entire career, like Michael Jordan did to Charles Barkley or Karl Malone. Kobe will retire long before LeBron.
That alone will probably allow LeBron to raise a championship trophy. Sure, there are Kevin Durant, Rajon Rondo, and who knows who else that will come up. But only Rondo has what Kobe has: killer instinct.
And that intensity is what truly sets Kobe part from James, from everyone else, for that matter.
LeBron is amazing, the best big player since Magic Johnson. If LeBron would develop a post-up game, a big man’s game in the paint, he would literally be unstoppable.
But when you look at Kobe, you see Michael.
Kobe’s got the same game, plays in the same triangle offense, and is now only one ring away from matching His Airness.
And, Kobe’s demeanor, work ethic, and drive are not just “Like Mike’s” but could almost be stronger, bordering on obsession, chasing both MJ and greatness.
In the opposite corner, LeBron right now is simply a poor-quality scan of Magic.
Sure, LeBron James is a one-of-a-kind player, the likes the NBA has never seen. At 260 pounds, the man is massive. In a different era, he would have played power forward. He can leap out of the building, can run like a point guard, and finishes near the rim like a legendary dunker.
LBJ also has improved his game in his seven years in the league. His range has increased, as has his accuracy.
He also learned to be a leader in Cleveland and carried his team to best record in the regular season, as well as taking his team to the NBA Finals.
While LeBron’s speed on the perimeter, explosiveness around the basket, and overall game differs from the point guard Magic, the new Heat player passes much like the Laker Legend and looks to involve his teammates in a similar fashion.
If LeBron really is Magic and could get up and down the court anything like the old Showtime Lakers from the 1980’s, it would be crazy time no matter what team the King reigned over.
But the real difference between these two great players is that Kobe has a Gladiator mentality. Hadarii Jones, a Featured Columnist here at the B/R, said it best in a recent article. “Kobe is a dying breed.”
The backlash that has swarmed the King after his decision to leave Cleveland for Miami is like a rainstorm in Seattle that never ends. And, from all angles, LeBron has been hit, from peers to legends.
The focus is all about LeBron’s heart, his will to win, and his ability to be “The Man” on his own team, not to partner with other greats.
The zinger that has stung the most was from Michael Jordan himself.
After a recent golf tourney, MJ said, “There's no way, with hindsight, I would've ever called up Larry, called up Magic and said, 'Hey, look, let's get together and play on one team.
"But that's...things are different. I can't say that's a bad thing. It's an opportunity these kids have today. In all honesty, I was trying to beat those guys."
Those comments from MJ are going to haunt LeBron for a very long time, at least until he wins multiple rings.
But the legend disappointment over LeBron’s decision didn’t stop there. Charles Barkley told the Arizona Republic last week, "Mike and I are in 100 percent agreement on this. If you're the two-time defending NBA MVP, you don't leave anywhere. They come to you. That's ridiculous.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/425503-lebron-james-vs-kobe-bryant-can-we-even-have-this-debate
Related articles by Zemanta
- Kobe Bryant: The Man, The Myth, The Legend (bleacherreport.com)
- LeBron James vs. Kobe Bryant: Can We Even Have This Debate? (bleacherreport.com)
- The Los Angeles Lakers Should Send Kobe Bryant To Knicks and Sign LeBron James (bleacherreport.com)
- Michael Jordan Thinks Kobe Bryant is Better Than LeBron James (urbanbellemag.com)
- Michael Jordan proclaims that Kobe Bryant is better than LeBron James (ballhype.com)
- VOTE: LeBron Vs. Kobe, Who Looks More Ridiculous In Their Magazine Photo Shoot? (sbnation.com)
- 5 Reasons Why LeBron James Is More Talented Than Kobe Bryant (bleacherreport.com)
- Michael Jordan Says Kobe Bryant Better Than LeBron James, Video (nowpublic.com)
- LeBron James: First-Ballot Hall Of Famer If He Retired Today? (bleacherreport.com)
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
NBA News 2010: Grading The Deal: Wolves Add Beasley, Ridnour
x
Image via WikipediaWhile the Raptors were uninterested in Beasley in a sign-and-trade for Chris Bosh, preferring the traded player exception and picks, the Bobcats and were absolutely interested in giving him a new start. The Rockets also might have been interested, but it is difficult to determine his true market since the Heat were only interested in sending him out free and clear. What we do know about his market is that it was absolutely soft regardless of how it is spun; if the Bulls were desperate to clear cap space for the Big 3 and wanted to shed Derrick Rose for example, we do know they would have had many more teams interested and multiple unprotected first rounders would be offered.But Minnesota is undoubtedly receiving a talented player, who won't turn 22 until after the first of the year. In terms of pure basketball ability, I still think he is the best player from the 2008 Draft, but there are several things working against him.
1. He is a classic tweener.
2. He has suffered from depression drug addiction.
The former is a bigger concern from Minnesota's perspective than the latter, because Beasley is absolutely not a Chris Washburn case. He is a good kid who has had a very high opinion of himself for years and the past year has sobered him up metaphorically and literally.
I remember speaking to Beasley while he was still in high school and he came across as insufferably arrogant, but he backed it up completely at Kansas State.
Beasley hasn't completely backed it up while in the NBA, but his first two seasons need to be put into a proper perspective. His rookie PER was 17.2 and it dropped to 16.1 this past season. The reason for the decline was largely predicated on his struggles with his jumper. He is a good pure shooter, but his game is predicated on confidence and that disappeared this past season.
Beasley is a high volume shooter and it is difficult for any coach to justify his usage when his eFG% is 46.3%. Depending on how Kurt Rambis plays Beasley, I expect that to immediately look like an outlier and he will become a 52.0% eFG% scorer at the very least.
If there is a path Beasley could optimistically look at, it would certainly be Chauncey Billups. The Celtics drafted Billups third overall in 1997, but traded him during his rookie season to the Raptors for Kenny Anderson. He was quickly traded to his hometown Nuggets, who eventually dealt him to the Magic. A big part of why he bounced around was injuries, but clearly multiple teams gave up on the talent he showed in Boulder.
Despite its simplicity, this easily has the potential of becoming David Kahn's best move as GM.
Grade for Wolves: A
I think the Triangle is a good system for Beasley eventually, but I worry about how long it will take him to learn it. He would be more likely to make an immediate impact if he had been traded to the Raptors, or the Rockets, but it is a situation that should benefit him in the long run.
Grade for Beasley: B
Miami accomplished its goal, so trading Beasley for nothing is simply the cost of doing business. But there has to be an uneasiness and a sense of regret in trading away a second overall pick just two years into his career. Even Darko Milicic, Beasley's new teammate, lasted two and a half seasons before the Pistons traded him to the Magic and they at least received a first round pick back in return.
Grade for Heat: C+
The Wolves have also added Luke Ridnour, signing him to a four-year, $16 million contract. I've been a mild Kahn apologist, waiting on him to finish cooking the meal before questioning the manner in which he's mixing up the ingredients. But if we are to equate point guards broccoli, how much broccoli is really needed?
Kahn appeared to sign Sessions last summer in a 'why not' move and grabbing Ridnour feels identical. He appears to be completely in asset compilation mode, but the problem with Ridnour is he represents an asset with a fast approaching expiration date.
Grade for Wolves: D+
Ridnour's market wasn't as lucrative as he might have been expecting, but at least this deal will let him play out the remaining seasons of his non-veteran's minimum seasons making more than twice as much. My biggest recommendation for Ridnour would be to rent in Minneapolis, because he'll probably be traded well before the 2012 Presidential election.
Grade for Ridnour: B
Related articles by Zemanta
- Newest Minnesota Timberwolves Eager To Show They're More Bite Than Bark (bleacherreport.com)
- Ridnour lands with T-wolves (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Ridnour will compete for starting PG in MN (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- "Reports: Jazz Close To Acquiring Al Jefferson From T'Wolves" and related posts (sbnation.com)
- 2010 NBA free agents: Luke Ridnour signs with Minnesota Timberwolves, seen challenging for starting role (sports.espn.go.com)
- AP source: Timberwolves agree to deal with Ridnour (sportingnews.com)
- AP source: Timberwolves agree to deal with Ridnour (sfgate.com)
- How Good Is Kevin Love and the Minnesota Timberwolves (bleacherreport.com)
- Report: Wolves, Ridnour agree to four-year deal (nba.com)
- AP source: Timberwolves agree to deal with Ridnour (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Report: Timberwolves sign Ridnour to four-year, $16 M deal (tsn.ca)
- Time To Give Minnesota Timberwolves' GM David Kahn A Lot More Credit (bleacherreport.com)
- Michael Beasley's Impact on the Minnesota Timberwolves (bleacherreport.com)
- Twitter / Adrian Wojnarowski: Luke Ridnour has agreed in ... (ballhype.com)
- Fuel For The Fire: Wolves Picked Dead Last (bleacherreport.com)
NBA News 2010: Fantasy Basketball: Wall, McGee impress in summer league
Image by K. Todd Storch via Flickr
If you're reading about fantasy basketball in July, then chances are you're more than a casual NBA fan. And if you're more than a casual fan, you'd be absolutely out of your mind not to try to attend at least one NBA summer league in your lifetime (before the lockout).
Yes, it is a league comprised of rookies, less-heralded young vets and also-rans. And it is dangerous to place too much stock in the results of the games. But some of these players do end up making an impact, both in the regular season and in fantasy leagues.
John Wall, PG, Washington Wizards: Let's start with the obvious. Wall had the best performance in the summer league, and that includes the previous week in Orlando. He's got "it," he's got speed, he was consistent, he's incredibly mature, he adjusted and cut down on turnovers, he got to the line and converted, and he's going to be a Day One starter on a rebuilding team that will give him all the minutes he can handle.
DeMarcus Cousins, PF/C, Sacramento Kings: Cousins was the only rookie to even scrape Wall in the "Dripping With Prodigious Talent" category in Las Vegas. Unfortunately, he also displayed the lack of maturity that cost him several spots in this year's draft. After a couple of monster games, Cousins slumped, got into foul trouble (getting a perfect 10 in one game) and came off as downright surly at times, having a couple of what John Waters would refer to as "glamour fits."
Rodrigue Beaubois, PG/SG, Dallas Mavericks: It was something of an off week for the lightning-fast Beaubois, mainly due to the fact that he was playing/learning point guard. The Mavericks are grooming him to be their floor general of the future, but Beaubois will see big minutes this fall alongside Jason Kidd at the 2.
Ed Davis, PF, Toronto Raptors: Davis didn't dominate, but he still had a quietly efficient week in Vegas. I'm not saying he's going to set the league on fire, but Toronto has a Chris Bosh-sized hole in the middle that Davis should step right into.
Greg Monroe, PF, Detroit Pistons: Monroe gathered steam as the week went on, showing the offensive polish that's going to eventually translate into solid fantasy production. He saved his best for last, going for 27 points and 14 rebounds in his finale versus the New York Knicks.
DeMar DeRozan, SG, Raptors: DeRozan is precisely the kind of player you have to remind yourself not to get too caught up with in the summer league. That being said, he was undeniably impressive, posting averages of 21.0 points and 4.5 rebounds per game.
Reggie Williams, SF, Golden State Warriors: Williams carried over his strong finish to the regular season with a dominant week in Vegas. As long as Don Nelson is the coach in Golden State ("how long" being the question as of this writing), Williams will have the chance to be a very good fantasy player.
J.J. Hickson, PF, Cleveland Cavaliers: It's hard to place too much stock in any Cavalier at the moment, but Hickson seems sure to be one player who won't be dealt in Cleveland's post-"The Decision" player movement frenzy.
JaVale McGee, C/PF, Wizards: McGee appears to be one longtime summer leaguer who's poised to make the jump to full-time fantasy contributor. McGee is still growing -- literally, still growing -- having added an inch to his previously 7-foot frame since the beginning of the 09-10 season. He's fully stocked in the athleticism department, but showed newfound signs of aggression in Vegas. McGee's bigger body, badder attitude and seemingly guaranteed starters' minutes all spell big-time sleeper potential.
Related articles by Zemanta
- NBA Power Rankings: Eastern Conference, (9-15) (bleacherreport.com)
- Best Players in 2010 NBA Summer League (everyjoe.com)
- NBA Power Rankings: Can Any Team's Starting Five Best The L.A. Lakers? (bleacherreport.com)
- NBA 2010-11: Young Players Due For Break-Out Season (bleacherreport.com)
- Chisholm: Plenty of interesting mathups on Raptors schedule (tsn.ca)
- 2010 NBA Summer League: Top 10 Performances from Las Vegas (bleacherreport.com)
- NBA 2010-11: 12 Returning Prospects Due For Break-Out Seasons (bleacherreport.com)
- Toronto Raptors: 30 NBA Team Previews in 30 Days (bleacherreport.com)
NBA 2010: Filling Out Golden State's Roster
Image via WikipediaFirst off, let’s be clear where the Warriors are roster-wise. They have Stephen Curry, Monta Ellis, Andris Biedrins, David Lee, Dorell Wright, Ekpe Udoh, Charlie Bell, Reggie Williams, Brandan Wright, Vladimir Radmanovic, and Dan Gadzuric under contract. That’s eleven players- every NBA team must carry between 13 and 15 players on roster at the start of the season (and at all times the rest of the year).
Leaving Udoh out because he will not be suiting up to start the season, the ten players Golden State has already includes one PG (Curry), four swingmen (Ellis, Wright, Bell, Williams), and five big men (Biedrins, Lee, Wright, Gadzuric, and Radmanovic). As such, the base 12-man has two spots to fill, one of which needs to be a PG.
Point Guards
The biggest challenge with the PG market this summer has been that the relatively few good options have been overpaid, particularly considering what the Warriors need. While some can argue effectively that Monta should get the PG minutes that Stephen does not play, I would rather see Monta focus on making the full transition to off-guard, especially since there is not a guy who can play lead guard in a SG’s body (so Monta could play off the ball and guard PG’s) in the free agent pool after Shaun Livingston signed with Charlotte.
Swingmen
With Ellis, Wright, Williams, and Bell likely to take up most of the minutes at SG and SF, this is more of a depth signing than anything else. Players like Antoine Wright and Keith Bogans would work fine yet are probably looking for either more money or more minutes than what the Warriors have to offer. Rasual Butler could play well next to Dorell Wright and Reggie Williams when Monta is on the bench, though he might be looking for more PT. Beyond him, I’d love to see a defensive-minded wing like Ime Udoka or a high-character veteran like Devean George to act as a mentor to the young group Golden State has.
Big Men
The most difficult obstacle when it comes to adding a big is the issue of fit. With Biedrins and David Lee clearly taking the lion’s share of the available minutes when healthy, the Warriors should look for big men through the lens of how they fit with those two guys. Brandan Wright and Ekpe Udoh are both worthy of minutes when healthy, but I worry about Radmanovic and Gadzuric getting any substantial playing time, particularly if Nelson is the coach (and he likely will be, though I hope Brian Shaw gets a big pitch sooner rather than later).
If Josh Boone is willing to come along, he would work. Anthony Tolliver was a solid pick-up for the Warriors and embraced a role which would be remarkably similar to this coming season. While I would rather see the Dubs pick up a C (since David Lee is a PF in the NBA), the Center crop is bad enough that the PF’s like Tolliver or Shavlik Randolph are worthy of consideration.
http://warriors.realgm.com/articles/185/20100720/filling_out_golden_states_roster/
Leaving Udoh out because he will not be suiting up to start the season, the ten players Golden State has already includes one PG (Curry), four swingmen (Ellis, Wright, Bell, Williams), and five big men (Biedrins, Lee, Wright, Gadzuric, and Radmanovic). As such, the base 12-man has two spots to fill, one of which needs to be a PG.
Point Guards
The biggest challenge with the PG market this summer has been that the relatively few good options have been overpaid, particularly considering what the Warriors need. While some can argue effectively that Monta should get the PG minutes that Stephen does not play, I would rather see Monta focus on making the full transition to off-guard, especially since there is not a guy who can play lead guard in a SG’s body (so Monta could play off the ball and guard PG’s) in the free agent pool after Shaun Livingston signed with Charlotte.
Swingmen
With Ellis, Wright, Williams, and Bell likely to take up most of the minutes at SG and SF, this is more of a depth signing than anything else. Players like Antoine Wright and Keith Bogans would work fine yet are probably looking for either more money or more minutes than what the Warriors have to offer. Rasual Butler could play well next to Dorell Wright and Reggie Williams when Monta is on the bench, though he might be looking for more PT. Beyond him, I’d love to see a defensive-minded wing like Ime Udoka or a high-character veteran like Devean George to act as a mentor to the young group Golden State has.
Big Men
The most difficult obstacle when it comes to adding a big is the issue of fit. With Biedrins and David Lee clearly taking the lion’s share of the available minutes when healthy, the Warriors should look for big men through the lens of how they fit with those two guys. Brandan Wright and Ekpe Udoh are both worthy of minutes when healthy, but I worry about Radmanovic and Gadzuric getting any substantial playing time, particularly if Nelson is the coach (and he likely will be, though I hope Brian Shaw gets a big pitch sooner rather than later).
If Josh Boone is willing to come along, he would work. Anthony Tolliver was a solid pick-up for the Warriors and embraced a role which would be remarkably similar to this coming season. While I would rather see the Dubs pick up a C (since David Lee is a PF in the NBA), the Center crop is bad enough that the PF’s like Tolliver or Shavlik Randolph are worthy of consideration.
http://warriors.realgm.com/articles/185/20100720/filling_out_golden_states_roster/
Related articles by Zemanta
- Joseph Lacob's Overhaul: Golden State Warriors New Big Three (bleacherreport.com)
- Taking a fast break (sfgate.com)
- What the Golden State Warriors Sale Means to City, Fans, Team (bleacherreport.com)
- Golden State Warriors: A Radical Plan for Next Year and the Future (bleacherreport.com)
- Golden State Warriors: From Confused to a Contender (bleacherreport.com)
- Where Stephen Curry, Monta Ellis Rank Among NBA's Top Backcourts (bleacherreport.com)
- David Lee Leaves Knicks for Warriors in Three-Player Trade (No Monta Ellis) (bleacherreport.com)
- Udoh Surgery on Wednesday to Repair Torn Ligament (ballhype.com)
Friday, July 16, 2010
NBA News 2010: Knicks Sign Felton, Mozgov
Image via WikipediaUsing cap space to sign Raymond Felton and Timofey Mozgov was not what anyone had in mind when the Knicks began clearing cap space in November and 2008 and it certainly was not the desired objective when they mortgaged a good portion of their future to create enough cap space for a second max contract slot.
But I've long been on record as supporting the decision of Donnie Walsh to gamble heavily on 2010, as even a 10% chance at LeBron James was clearly worth it.
Furthermore, at least the Knicks did sign Amar'e Stoudemire instead of Tyrus Thomas or Hakim Warrick with that massive amount of cap space.
Felton is at his best when he is able to get out in transition and in the pick-and-roll. Those of course are two of the main job requirements of a Seven Seconds or Less point guard. While with the Bobcats, Felton didn't receive too many of these opportunities in a slowpaced system.
He is capable of shooting the ball well from the perimeter, but he is absolutely streaky. Felton had a career best three-point percentage in 09-10 of 38.5%, up from two consecutive seasons below 30%. He came into the league shooting 35.8% with a larger sample size, but obviously struggled in maintaining its reliability. Felton's shot was something that wasn't a key strength coming out of North Carolina, but it was surprisingly better than expected once scouts were able to take a look in workouts.
I don't think Felton is suddenly going to become the next Steve Nash by coming into this system, but he undoubtedly will be a more valuable and productive player for the Knicks than he ever was for Charlotte.
Grade for Knicks on Felton: A-
If I were Felton, I would have been far more eager to secure a long-term deal given the free-wheeling climate the uncertainty of the CBA. If there is a certain kind of player that gets squeezed after the players and owners finally settle on a new deal, it will be personified by a middle of the road guy like Felton. A full MLE type of deal from another team would have paid less on an annual basis, but at least it would guarantee $34M over the next five years. The decision to accept just $14.56M puts a lot of strain on that summer of 2012 for Felton since that kind of money falls a little short of setting him up and everyone he cares about for life.
With that said, Felton now has the opportunity to prove himself to be more than just an average starting point guard in a system that showcases point guards. He could play his way into a five or six-year extension at $10M or so annually in 2012 while he's still just 28.
Grade for Felton: B
The Mozgov signing is obviously an interesting futures bet, as 7'1" guys with some agility and pure skill don't exactly grow on trees. I've never seen him in regular game action, but I watched just under 100 individual clips of him.
The biggest thing for him is if he is able to create some space for himself, as he looks pretty good in those instances. Mozgov has decent touch and lift to the bucket, but far too many of his attempts are capable of getting blocked with how he puts the ball out in front of himself. He's unafraid of being physical when posting up for position, but he tends to get a little soft upon the catch.
His hands are decent and his presence on the weakside will lead to some easy dishes after a double-team on Amar'e Stoudemire, as well as put backs. Mozgov is also fully capable of running the pick-and-roll, but he needs to receive the ball within four or five feet of the bucket.
Grade for Knicks on Mozgov: A
Mozgov's NBA career may quickly stop soon after it starts because of the potential work stoppage, but he at least will have a full season to prove himself against NBA competition. He also has the luxury of playing in a system that suits him where he is guaranteed playing time for a team with low expectations for the position.
Grade for Mozgov: A-
http://knicks.realgm.com/articles/56/20100716/grading_the_deal_knicks_sign_felton_mozgov/
But I've long been on record as supporting the decision of Donnie Walsh to gamble heavily on 2010, as even a 10% chance at LeBron James was clearly worth it.
Furthermore, at least the Knicks did sign Amar'e Stoudemire instead of Tyrus Thomas or Hakim Warrick with that massive amount of cap space.
Felton is at his best when he is able to get out in transition and in the pick-and-roll. Those of course are two of the main job requirements of a Seven Seconds or Less point guard. While with the Bobcats, Felton didn't receive too many of these opportunities in a slowpaced system.
He is capable of shooting the ball well from the perimeter, but he is absolutely streaky. Felton had a career best three-point percentage in 09-10 of 38.5%, up from two consecutive seasons below 30%. He came into the league shooting 35.8% with a larger sample size, but obviously struggled in maintaining its reliability. Felton's shot was something that wasn't a key strength coming out of North Carolina, but it was surprisingly better than expected once scouts were able to take a look in workouts.
I don't think Felton is suddenly going to become the next Steve Nash by coming into this system, but he undoubtedly will be a more valuable and productive player for the Knicks than he ever was for Charlotte.
Grade for Knicks on Felton: A-
If I were Felton, I would have been far more eager to secure a long-term deal given the free-wheeling climate the uncertainty of the CBA. If there is a certain kind of player that gets squeezed after the players and owners finally settle on a new deal, it will be personified by a middle of the road guy like Felton. A full MLE type of deal from another team would have paid less on an annual basis, but at least it would guarantee $34M over the next five years. The decision to accept just $14.56M puts a lot of strain on that summer of 2012 for Felton since that kind of money falls a little short of setting him up and everyone he cares about for life.
With that said, Felton now has the opportunity to prove himself to be more than just an average starting point guard in a system that showcases point guards. He could play his way into a five or six-year extension at $10M or so annually in 2012 while he's still just 28.
Grade for Felton: B
The Mozgov signing is obviously an interesting futures bet, as 7'1" guys with some agility and pure skill don't exactly grow on trees. I've never seen him in regular game action, but I watched just under 100 individual clips of him.
The biggest thing for him is if he is able to create some space for himself, as he looks pretty good in those instances. Mozgov has decent touch and lift to the bucket, but far too many of his attempts are capable of getting blocked with how he puts the ball out in front of himself. He's unafraid of being physical when posting up for position, but he tends to get a little soft upon the catch.
His hands are decent and his presence on the weakside will lead to some easy dishes after a double-team on Amar'e Stoudemire, as well as put backs. Mozgov is also fully capable of running the pick-and-roll, but he needs to receive the ball within four or five feet of the bucket.
Grade for Knicks on Mozgov: A
Mozgov's NBA career may quickly stop soon after it starts because of the potential work stoppage, but he at least will have a full season to prove himself against NBA competition. He also has the luxury of playing in a system that suits him where he is guaranteed playing time for a team with low expectations for the position.
Grade for Mozgov: A-
http://knicks.realgm.com/articles/56/20100716/grading_the_deal_knicks_sign_felton_mozgov/
Related articles by Zemanta
- New York Knicks: Six Bold Predictions for 2010-11 (bleacherreport.com)
- Knicks sign Russian center Mozgov to contract (reuters.com)
- Knicks Sign Mozgov, a Center From Russia (nytimes.com)
- The Knicks Off Season Was...A Success (continued) (bleacherreport.com)
- Without James, Knicks Focus on Improvement (nytimes.com)
- Knicks sign seven-foot-one Russian centre Timofey Mozgov (tsn.ca)
- Knicks sign Russian center Mozgov (nba.com)
- Busy New York Knicks ink 7-foot-1 Russian center Timofey Mozgov (sports.espn.go.com)
- Knicks sign Russian center Mozgov to contract (reuters.com)
- Without James, Knicks Focus on Improvement (nytimes.com)
NBA News 2010: Fantasy Basketball: Felton should thrive with Knicks
Image via Wikipedia
The NBA's version of Super Friends have joined forces in South Beach and permanently altered the face of the NBA, not to mention the first round of fantasy hoops drafts. If you're such a fantasy hoops junkie that you're keeping up on things in mid-July, then you know that fantasy titles aren't won in the first round. They're claimed in the middle and later rounds by knowing the sleepers from the busts. So while the casual fan and also-rans in your fantasy hoops leagues are still droning on and on about LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh, let's get a leg up on the competition and discuss the effect that trades and signings have had on less-newsworthy players.
Raymond Felton, PG, New York Knicks
Now he'll handle the point for a team that runs-and-guns under coach Mike D'Antoni and has plenty of players who can finish his passes (e.g., Amare Stoudemire, Anthony Randolph, Danilo Gallinari and Wilson Chandler). Fantasy leaguers should remember when he teased us with a tantalizing second half of his rookie campaign: 16.7 ppg, 7.6 apg, 1.4 spg, 2.0 3s. His final nine games looked like this: 17.2 ppg, 9.8 apg, 2.0 spg, 1.3 3s. In fact, if he can harness the restraint and fundamentals that Brown taught him in Charlotte and turn them loose in the freedom of D'Antoni's offense, he could be the top point-guard sleeper this fall.
Al Jefferson, C/PF, Utah Jazz
He should be a shoo-in for 20 points, 10-plus rebounds and 1.5 blocks. Jefferson's arrival could spell trouble for Paul Millsap or Mehmet Okur, because one of them will have to come off the bench. Starting Jefferson at center, Millsap at power forward and bringing Okur in as the sixth man makes the most sense to me, but we'll have to wait to see what Sloan says as the season nears.
Raja Bell, SG, Jazz
In Utah, he'll be a defensive stopper, which is a bit of a misnomer in fantasy parlance, because he's averaged only 0.7 steals per game during his career. Consider him only in very deep leagues for his triples.
Tyson Chandler, C, Dallas Mavericks
Haywood is slated to start, so Chandler shouldn't have much of any value on draft day. Still, if he's healthy and Haywood goes down, he could be a rebounding machine. Just remember that he won't give you much of anything else.
Al Harrington, PF, Denver Nuggets
More likely, Harrington will be a productive fantasy option (via scoring, rebounding and hitting some triples) for a few weeks at a time when injuries open up a full load of minutes.
Luke Ridnour, PG, Timberwolves
With PGs Jonny Flynn and Ramon Sessions on the roster (and Ricky Rubio overseas), Ridnour will have a tough time finding any fantasy value. At least he has Darko Milicic to pass to now.
Mike Miller, SF/SG, Miami Heat
The Heat get a ball-handling 3-point shooter and Miller gets a chance to win some titles as a role player. Unfortunately, the move officially ends Miller's days as a quality fantasy option. He should get enough assists and 3s as a reserve to help in deep leagues, though.
Zydrunas Ilgauskas, C, Heat
The Heat signed Ilgauskas only for depth in the frontcourt. With LeBron, D-Wade and Bosh hitting most of their shots and crashing the boards, there won't be enough minutes or rebounds left to make Ilgauskas relevant in fantasy this season.
Josh Childress, SF/SG, Suns
He has a fluid game and can score, board and play D, so he'll fit in well with the Suns. While he'll have great percentages and decent rebounds for a swingman, he won't knock down a lot of 3s, and he will likely be limited to a reserve role with the Suns. That means he should have some value, but with limited upside.
Hedo Turkoglu, SF, Suns
Care to guess how many times Hedo has shot 42 percent or better during the past seven seasons? Twice: 45.4 percent in 2005-06 and 45.6 percent in 2007-08 with the Orlando Magic. He must be grinning ear-to-ear knowing that he's going to ball with Steve Nash this season, though. Turkoglu will benefit from getting the ball from Nash at the right time in the right place. So expect him reach that 45-percent mark again this season while scoring 15-plus ppg and at least a couple of 3s per game. However, playing alongside dish-master Nash surely will decrease Turkoglu's assist production.
Leandro Barbosa, SG, Raptors
Barbosa's fantasy value may be resurrected with the Raptors, assuming he starts. Remember that during the 2006-07 campaign he averaged 18.1 ppg, 4.0 apg. 1.2 spg and 2.4 3s. Since the Raptors don't have Steve Nash handling the point (or even Chris Bosh to help out in the post), those numbers should remain career-bests for Barbosa.
Shaun Livingston, PG, Bobcats
D.J. Augustin and Livingston will battle to replace Felton as the Bobcats' starting point guard. Either could be a sleeper with a full set of starter's minutes. It's safe to say that Livingston surprised everyone by averaging 15.5 ppg, 6.3 apg and 3.6 rpg while shooting 62.7 percent from the field and 83.3 percent from the charity stripe in eight April games.
Wesley Matthews, SG, Portland Trail Blazers
Matthews can play D and knock down 3s, so he's worth keeping an eye on if he can lock up quality minutes -- but there's the rub with so much competition for playing time.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Knicks 'close' to signing Felton (nypost.com)
- 2010 NBA Offseason: Grading Every Team's Signings, Trades, and More (bleacherreport.com)
- NBA Rumors: Considering The New York Knicks' Three Trade Opportunities (bleacherreport.com)
- Acing the Test: Grading all 30 NBA Teams Off-Season (bleacherreport.com)
- NBA Power Rankings: Can Any Team's Starting Five Best The L.A. Lakers? (bleacherreport.com)
- NBA Dollars And Sense: 10 Economically-Sound Signings This Offseason (bleacherreport.com)
Thursday, July 15, 2010
NBA News 2010: Mavericks Use EDNGC For Chandler
Image via WikipediaLike so many teams (outside of the Heat) who entered the summer of 2010, the Mavericks had ambitious hopes for how they would use the non-guaranteed contract of Erick Dampier. I'm sure Tyson Chandler wasn't amongst their top-10 choices for how to use the trade chip, but he undoubtedly becomes another strong piece on an already deep team.
The Mavericks also approached an advanced stage of trade discussions with the Wolves on Al Jefferson, but David Kahn received two first round picks from Utah and he did not have to take back any bad contracts that Dallas had hoped for. So Chandler became the less costly alternative for the Mavericks since they unloaded Eduardo Najera and Matt Carroll in the process, while also acquiring young project center Alexis Ajinca.
The fundamental problem with the Dallas strategy of using the Dampier non-guaranteed contract (EDNGC for short) was the somewhat unforeseen flood of traded player exceptions to hit the market. We knew there was a good chance that Toronto would acquire one by doing a sign-and-trade involving Chris Bosh, but we expected Cleveland to stubbornly decline participation involving LeBron James. The Jazz and Suns also received TPEs from the Bulls and Knicks for Carlos Boozer and Amar'e Stoudemire.
Leaving that as an aside, what are the Mavericks gaining in Chandler?
Chandler is approaching 28 and has become increasingly fragile physically in his late 20s. He also has been traded twice without actually being all the way traded. First, he was dealt to Oklahoma City in February of 2009, only to have it rescinded after a physical. More recently, he was told by the Bobcats that he would be dealt to Toronto, only to have Michael Jordan kill it at the last minute.
Chandler's PER dropped from his career highs of 17.0 and 17.5 in 06-07 and 07-08 down to 13.4 and 12.5 in each of the past two seasons. The most recent PER was especially problematic since his minutes per game dropped to 22.8 and efficiency should generally rise when playing fewer minutes.
The major reason for the decline has been his rapid and substantial drop on the glass. Chandler's rebound percentage was 20.7% and 19.5% during the successful two-year run and just 16.4% and 16.6% in each of the past two seasons. He has been banged up and rebounding is where we do begin to see the early stages of physical decline, or injury.
Chander did, however, have a career high in TS% at 64.3%, but his eFG% remained far lower than the 62.4%/62.3% of a couple years ago. The TS% increase was due to his sudden elevation of his free throw shooting.
While with the Bobcats, the vast majority of his offense came on the offensive glass and on cuts. Chandler has always been efficient with put backs, but his offensive rebound rate will need to get back to where it was originally in New Orleans to make a real impact for the Mavericks. He was once a dangerous pick-and-roll threat, but that hasn't returned since his injury and he was never very good in the post to begin with.
Defensively, he has suffered some slippage as well, but he'll still block his shots here and there. His block rate in 09-10 was less than some of his peaks, but it was his highest rate since 06-07. He is not the best post defender and struggles against his own man in the pick-and-roll, but at the very least he's a long body that can stand eye-to-eye against Gasol and Andrew Bynum.
Grade for Mavericks: B
The Bobcats were appearing likely to trade Chandler and Boris Diaw to the Raptors for Jose Calderon and Reggie Evans, but again went with this trade of pure spare parts. Charlotte receives some savings in the first year, but they weren't over the luxury tax, so it is difficult to understand the impetus.
Grade for Bobcats: C+
http://mavericks.realgm.com/articles/73/20100715/grading_the_deal_mavericks_use_edngc_for_chandler/
The Mavericks also approached an advanced stage of trade discussions with the Wolves on Al Jefferson, but David Kahn received two first round picks from Utah and he did not have to take back any bad contracts that Dallas had hoped for. So Chandler became the less costly alternative for the Mavericks since they unloaded Eduardo Najera and Matt Carroll in the process, while also acquiring young project center Alexis Ajinca.
The fundamental problem with the Dallas strategy of using the Dampier non-guaranteed contract (EDNGC for short) was the somewhat unforeseen flood of traded player exceptions to hit the market. We knew there was a good chance that Toronto would acquire one by doing a sign-and-trade involving Chris Bosh, but we expected Cleveland to stubbornly decline participation involving LeBron James. The Jazz and Suns also received TPEs from the Bulls and Knicks for Carlos Boozer and Amar'e Stoudemire.
Leaving that as an aside, what are the Mavericks gaining in Chandler?
Chandler is approaching 28 and has become increasingly fragile physically in his late 20s. He also has been traded twice without actually being all the way traded. First, he was dealt to Oklahoma City in February of 2009, only to have it rescinded after a physical. More recently, he was told by the Bobcats that he would be dealt to Toronto, only to have Michael Jordan kill it at the last minute.
Chandler's PER dropped from his career highs of 17.0 and 17.5 in 06-07 and 07-08 down to 13.4 and 12.5 in each of the past two seasons. The most recent PER was especially problematic since his minutes per game dropped to 22.8 and efficiency should generally rise when playing fewer minutes.
The major reason for the decline has been his rapid and substantial drop on the glass. Chandler's rebound percentage was 20.7% and 19.5% during the successful two-year run and just 16.4% and 16.6% in each of the past two seasons. He has been banged up and rebounding is where we do begin to see the early stages of physical decline, or injury.
Chander did, however, have a career high in TS% at 64.3%, but his eFG% remained far lower than the 62.4%/62.3% of a couple years ago. The TS% increase was due to his sudden elevation of his free throw shooting.
While with the Bobcats, the vast majority of his offense came on the offensive glass and on cuts. Chandler has always been efficient with put backs, but his offensive rebound rate will need to get back to where it was originally in New Orleans to make a real impact for the Mavericks. He was once a dangerous pick-and-roll threat, but that hasn't returned since his injury and he was never very good in the post to begin with.
Defensively, he has suffered some slippage as well, but he'll still block his shots here and there. His block rate in 09-10 was less than some of his peaks, but it was his highest rate since 06-07. He is not the best post defender and struggles against his own man in the pick-and-roll, but at the very least he's a long body that can stand eye-to-eye against Gasol and Andrew Bynum.
Grade for Mavericks: B
The Bobcats were appearing likely to trade Chandler and Boris Diaw to the Raptors for Jose Calderon and Reggie Evans, but again went with this trade of pure spare parts. Charlotte receives some savings in the first year, but they weren't over the luxury tax, so it is difficult to understand the impetus.
Grade for Bobcats: C+
http://mavericks.realgm.com/articles/73/20100715/grading_the_deal_mavericks_use_edngc_for_chandler/
Related articles by Zemanta
- Chandler healthy, ready to help Mavericks (sportingnews.com)
- Tyson Chandler says he's healthy in Dallas Mavericks introduction (sports.espn.go.com)
- Bobcats ship Chandler to Mavericks in five-player trade (reuters.com)
- Bobcats ship Chandler to Mavericks (theglobeandmail.com)
- Bobcats send Tyson Chandler to Dallas, not Toronto (thestar.com)
- Sources: Dallas Mavericks get Tyson Chandler in five-player deal (sports.espn.go.com)
- Bobcats send Chandler to Dallas in 5-player deal (charlotte.news14.com)
- Bobcats send Chandler to Dallas in 5-player deal (sportingnews.com)
- Bobcats ship Chandler to Mavericks in five-player trade (reuters.com)
- "NBA Rumor: Tyson Chandler traded to Dallas for Erick Dampier" and related posts (dimemag.com)
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
NBA News 2010: Bobcats Keep Tyrus Thomas
Image via WikipediaBuilding off their investment of a first round pick sent to Chicago to acquire him, the Bobcats signed Tyrus Thomas to a five-year, $40 million contract.
Thomas was a restricted free agent who I thought would benefit from the unique nature of the 2010 summer. This is a great deal for him financially, though it isn't the type of obscene money I once thought might be possible.
The trajectory of his career has always been one that I compare with Rudy Gay. They were both members of the 2006 Draft class and some of Gay's flaws were exposed in his sophomore season at UConn, while Thomas had a meteoric rise during his one and done run at LSU.
The numbers Thomas posted for the Bulls were never horrific by any means, typically averaging 13 points and about nine boards and at least two blocks per 36 minutes.
With the Bobcats, he played just 25 games and a total of 542 minutes, but his PER, usage and total rebound percentage were career highs.
He needs to be a finisher at the rim in order to be effective offensively, but he also needs lobs and dishes to get those, so they happen with not nearly enough frequency for how much he likes to take shots. His jumper isn't awful by any stretch, but it would be better utilized as something to offset the dunk instead of vice versa.
Defensively, Thomas is a special shotblocker and he is a top-10 player in terms of block percentage. He is typically committed to doing the non-glamorous aspects of defending and does a good job of it. He also is capable of defending both power forwards and small forwards.
He is an ideal player to bring off the bench because of his energy and the probability that he will be better than his counterpart also coming off the bench. Most teams would prefer, however, to have a player of Thomas' level of ability be on a rookie contract instead of making high seven-figures in each of the next five seasons.
Grade for Bobcats: B-
The Suns were looking for more affordable replacements to Amar'e Stoudemire this summer and I thought he would be a good fit for the team. Given the possibility of receiving one more decent sized contract when this new one is up before phasing into veteran minimum status, taking a little less money to showcase himself with an elite passing point guard might have been a prudent gamble.
Ultimately, $40 million over five seasons is a good deal for a player who was traded away because his former team preferred cap space over the risk of him taking the qualifying offer. The fact that Chicago was able to receive a future first for him, despite being so close to restricted free agency did reveal how much Charlotte liked him and the good possibility that he would be retained.
Grade for Thomas: A-
http://bobcats.realgm.com/articles/44/20100714/grading_the_deal_bobcats_keep_tyrus_thomas/
Thomas was a restricted free agent who I thought would benefit from the unique nature of the 2010 summer. This is a great deal for him financially, though it isn't the type of obscene money I once thought might be possible.
The trajectory of his career has always been one that I compare with Rudy Gay. They were both members of the 2006 Draft class and some of Gay's flaws were exposed in his sophomore season at UConn, while Thomas had a meteoric rise during his one and done run at LSU.
The numbers Thomas posted for the Bulls were never horrific by any means, typically averaging 13 points and about nine boards and at least two blocks per 36 minutes.
With the Bobcats, he played just 25 games and a total of 542 minutes, but his PER, usage and total rebound percentage were career highs.
He needs to be a finisher at the rim in order to be effective offensively, but he also needs lobs and dishes to get those, so they happen with not nearly enough frequency for how much he likes to take shots. His jumper isn't awful by any stretch, but it would be better utilized as something to offset the dunk instead of vice versa.
Defensively, Thomas is a special shotblocker and he is a top-10 player in terms of block percentage. He is typically committed to doing the non-glamorous aspects of defending and does a good job of it. He also is capable of defending both power forwards and small forwards.
He is an ideal player to bring off the bench because of his energy and the probability that he will be better than his counterpart also coming off the bench. Most teams would prefer, however, to have a player of Thomas' level of ability be on a rookie contract instead of making high seven-figures in each of the next five seasons.
Grade for Bobcats: B-
The Suns were looking for more affordable replacements to Amar'e Stoudemire this summer and I thought he would be a good fit for the team. Given the possibility of receiving one more decent sized contract when this new one is up before phasing into veteran minimum status, taking a little less money to showcase himself with an elite passing point guard might have been a prudent gamble.
Ultimately, $40 million over five seasons is a good deal for a player who was traded away because his former team preferred cap space over the risk of him taking the qualifying offer. The fact that Chicago was able to receive a future first for him, despite being so close to restricted free agency did reveal how much Charlotte liked him and the good possibility that he would be retained.
Grade for Thomas: A-
http://bobcats.realgm.com/articles/44/20100714/grading_the_deal_bobcats_keep_tyrus_thomas/
Related articles by Zemanta
- 2010 NBA Free Agents: Tyrus Thomas of Charlotte Bobcats says he wants to stay in Charlotte (sports.espn.go.com)
- Charlotte Bobcats, Tyrus Thomas agree on five-year, $40 million contract (sports.espn.go.com)
- Soon-to-be free agent Thomas wants to stay a Bobcat (cbssports.com)
- "Bobcats reach terms with restricted free agent F Tyrus Thomas on 5-year, $40 million deal" and related posts (taragana.com)
- Bobcats, Thomas agree on 5-year, $40 million deal (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- NBA Trade Rumor: Could Carmelo Anthony Become a Charlotte Bobcat? (bleacherreport.com)
- Nets pass on Tyrus Thomas, who re-signs with Bobcats (ballhype.com)
- Bobcats, Thomas agree on 5-year, $40 million deal (sportingnews.com)
- Charlotte Bobcats extend $6.2M qualifying offer to Tyrus Thomas (sports.espn.go.com)
- Charlotte Bobcats, Tyrus Thomas agree on five-year, $40 million contract (sports.espn.go.com)
NBA News 2010: Jazz Replace Boozer With Jefferson
Image by Doug Wallick via FlickrThe Jazz and Wolves made a simple trade on Tuesday, exchanging Al Jefferson for two future first round picks, a former first round pick in Kosta Koufos and a traded player exception.
But the trade gets more interesting when we play retroactive GM and realize the Jazz essentially swapped Carlos Boozer (along with what was sent to Minnesota) for Jefferson. The contract Jefferson is under is more affordable annually and is also shorter in length, plus he is several years younger.
For the Wolves, they have now essentially sent Kevin Garnett to the Celtics for Jonny Flynn (their own pick back from the Wally Szczerbiak trade), Wayne Ellington, Koufos, Martell Webster and two more additional picks. It is a whole collection of assets that conceivably could have instead been Stephen Curry and DeJuan Blair, but it is certainly a forewarning to the Hornets as they continue to internally debate whether or not to trade Chris Paul.
Conversely, a preemptive strike such as what Minnesota accomplished with Garnett and Utah did not do with Boozer almost always elicits a better return.
The Cavaliers and Heat each received as much for LeBron James and Chris Bosh, respectively, as the Wolves did for Jefferson. At the very least, it is a feather of some degree in David Kahn's hat, even if it is not an analogous comparison.
Kahn might have drafted two point guards in Flynn and Ricky Rubio, plus signed a third in Ramon Sessions during this first couple of months on the job, but he at least did not draft a second power forward when the old regime picked up Kevin Love. The trade for Love was a good one, as it shifted around some assets and he was the better prospect for Minnesota than O.J. Mayo, but it did create this roster imbalance. Not to discredit Love, but drafting Brook Lopez, who did appear to be their preferred pick at various times would have made life infinitely less complicated.
Minnesota knew they had to trade either Jefferson or Love and they absolutely made the correct decision. Right off the top, Love is younger and cheaper than Jefferson, plus I believe he is ultimately the superior player.
There was the pipe dream of trading Jefferson for someone like Danny Granger, but that was always unrealistic. I thought they could eventually do well by dealing him for someone a little less established, but his injury concerns, somewhat burdensome contract and the limited way he impacts a game.
Defensively and as a passer, Jefferson doesn't offer his team very much. He is a true power forward, but he is capable of being a big body of resistance in the paint against bigger offensive players, even if the resistance is relatively useless.
For the Jazz, acquiring Jefferson one week after losing Boozer at least allows them to sustain their 09-10 level of play for the remainder of Deron Williams' contract. As much as this franchise will ever appease a player, remaining committed to doing everything within their power to keep Williams content with the situation is an imperative given how valuable he is to their continued success. The Jazz are in a better situation than the Hornets are with Chris Paul, but they were another backtrack move or two away having Williams become more vocal with displeasure.
This move does once again murk up Paul Millsap's role with the team. Do the Jazz go small and start both Millsap and Jefferson, or do they remain more conventional?
Furthermore, the logic of passing on Ed Davis and Patrick Patterson in favor of Gordon Hayward becomes more clear in light of the Jefferson acquisition. I had both of those power forwards rated higher than Hayward, plus the need for a replacement for Boozer seemed like an inevitability.
Grade for Jazz: B-
Ultimately, this trade was one both teams had to make because the alternatives were unattractive, even if this doesn't feel great. The Jazz could ill-afford to begin the season without bringing in a replacement for Boozer's production and Jefferson's trade value wasn't going to increase when the season began and Kahn would be forced into increasing his desperation.
Grade for Wolves: B+
http://jazz.realgm.com/articles/43/20100714/grading_the_deal_jazz_replace_boozer_with_jefferson/
But the trade gets more interesting when we play retroactive GM and realize the Jazz essentially swapped Carlos Boozer (along with what was sent to Minnesota) for Jefferson. The contract Jefferson is under is more affordable annually and is also shorter in length, plus he is several years younger.
For the Wolves, they have now essentially sent Kevin Garnett to the Celtics for Jonny Flynn (their own pick back from the Wally Szczerbiak trade), Wayne Ellington, Koufos, Martell Webster and two more additional picks. It is a whole collection of assets that conceivably could have instead been Stephen Curry and DeJuan Blair, but it is certainly a forewarning to the Hornets as they continue to internally debate whether or not to trade Chris Paul.
Conversely, a preemptive strike such as what Minnesota accomplished with Garnett and Utah did not do with Boozer almost always elicits a better return.
The Cavaliers and Heat each received as much for LeBron James and Chris Bosh, respectively, as the Wolves did for Jefferson. At the very least, it is a feather of some degree in David Kahn's hat, even if it is not an analogous comparison.
Kahn might have drafted two point guards in Flynn and Ricky Rubio, plus signed a third in Ramon Sessions during this first couple of months on the job, but he at least did not draft a second power forward when the old regime picked up Kevin Love. The trade for Love was a good one, as it shifted around some assets and he was the better prospect for Minnesota than O.J. Mayo, but it did create this roster imbalance. Not to discredit Love, but drafting Brook Lopez, who did appear to be their preferred pick at various times would have made life infinitely less complicated.
Minnesota knew they had to trade either Jefferson or Love and they absolutely made the correct decision. Right off the top, Love is younger and cheaper than Jefferson, plus I believe he is ultimately the superior player.
There was the pipe dream of trading Jefferson for someone like Danny Granger, but that was always unrealistic. I thought they could eventually do well by dealing him for someone a little less established, but his injury concerns, somewhat burdensome contract and the limited way he impacts a game.
Defensively and as a passer, Jefferson doesn't offer his team very much. He is a true power forward, but he is capable of being a big body of resistance in the paint against bigger offensive players, even if the resistance is relatively useless.
For the Jazz, acquiring Jefferson one week after losing Boozer at least allows them to sustain their 09-10 level of play for the remainder of Deron Williams' contract. As much as this franchise will ever appease a player, remaining committed to doing everything within their power to keep Williams content with the situation is an imperative given how valuable he is to their continued success. The Jazz are in a better situation than the Hornets are with Chris Paul, but they were another backtrack move or two away having Williams become more vocal with displeasure.
This move does once again murk up Paul Millsap's role with the team. Do the Jazz go small and start both Millsap and Jefferson, or do they remain more conventional?
Furthermore, the logic of passing on Ed Davis and Patrick Patterson in favor of Gordon Hayward becomes more clear in light of the Jefferson acquisition. I had both of those power forwards rated higher than Hayward, plus the need for a replacement for Boozer seemed like an inevitability.
Grade for Jazz: B-
Ultimately, this trade was one both teams had to make because the alternatives were unattractive, even if this doesn't feel great. The Jazz could ill-afford to begin the season without bringing in a replacement for Boozer's production and Jefferson's trade value wasn't going to increase when the season began and Kahn would be forced into increasing his desperation.
Grade for Wolves: B+
http://jazz.realgm.com/articles/43/20100714/grading_the_deal_jazz_replace_boozer_with_jefferson/
Related articles by Zemanta
- Timberwolves trade Jefferson to Jazz (cbc.ca)
- It's About Time: Al Jefferson Is Traded To The Jazz (bleacherreport.com)
- AP source: Al Jefferson headed from Wolves to Jazz (sportingnews.com)
- Report: Wolves to trade Jefferson to Jazz (nba.com)
- Jazz introduce new addition Al Jefferson (sportingnews.com)
- Utah Jazz acquires forward Al Jefferson in trade with Minnesota Timberwolves | NBA (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Utah Jazz introduce new addition Al Jefferson (sports.espn.go.com)
- AP Source: Al Jefferson Headed From Wolves to Jazz (abcnews.go.com)
- Al Jefferson headed from Wolves to Jazz (nba.com)
- T'wolves send Jefferson to Jazz (theglobeandmail.com)
- "Reports: Jazz Close To Acquiring Al Jefferson From T'Wolves" and related posts (sbnation.com)
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
NBA News 2010: Why LeBron Should Have Stayed
Image via WikipediaIt finally happened. Lebron James left town, and Cleveland responded with an angry letter from the owner, jerseys set on fire, mural disappearances, and most notably, thousands upon thousands of broken hearts.
In all fairness, James had every right to leave; after all, he was a free agent. Regardless, Lebron’s departure has clearly left the fans in Cleveland disappointed, and rightfully so. Aside from the fact that James is a superior player than his two new teammates down in Miami, there are other significant factors that differentiate Lebron’s departure from that of Chris Bosh, and Dwyane Wade’s initial contemplation of leaving Miami.
Here are a few reasons why the Cleveland Cavaliers and their fans deserved better from number 23:
1) Cleveland was a Consistent Championship Contender
In the past 4 seasons, the Cavaliers won 222 of a possible 328 regular season games. Their winning percentage of 67.7% over four years is the highest in the league. While the Miami Heat and Toronto Raptors either faced yearly first round eliminations, or failed to qualify for the playoffs altogether, LeBron and the Cavs not only made the playoffs every year, but were consistently considered favorites for the Eastern Conference.
2) Cleveland’s Commitment to Winning via Trades and Signings
Looking at the serious title contenders of the past few years, no team made as many impact player transactions as the Cavaliers. While the Lakers began last summer by essentially swapping Trevor Ariza for Ron Artest, and the Orlando Magic traded for Vince Carter after deciding Hedo Turkoglu wouldn’t be worth the money he would command, the Cleveland front office consistently showed their dedication to winning.
Speaking from a strictly numbers standpoint, the Cavs have either traded for or signed eight players that have been in the rotation since 2008. After the injury plagued season of that year, the Cavaliers swung a deal for Mo Williams, adding another knock down shooter who also happened to be the best point guard that LeBron had ever played with.
Then, months before the 2010 playoffs, the Cavaliers acquired another former All-Star in Antawn Jamison to fill the role of the coveted stretch 4.
In the end, none of these moves were enough to get the Cavs over the hump to win that elusive NBA ring. However, it was not due to a lack of effort from the Cleveland front office.
3) Cleveland Would Have Only Benefited as Time Went On
Now, while the Celtics showed their rejuvenation act in the playoffs this year, even the most die-hard Boston fan cannot deny that they have one, maybe two years left with their current roster before they fall back into mediocrity. Kevin Garnett is already a shell of his former self, Ray Allen’s flat jumper in the Finals revealed the effects of being a 35 shooting guard in the NBA, while Paul Pierce has also shown steady signs of decline. Rajon Rondo’s substantial improvement may keep the team from completely dropping to the bottom of the standings as the older guys phase out.
This means that had LeBron stayed with the Cavs, it would be very possible that as soon as this upcoming season, the only team that would pose a serious threat to them in their conference for the next few years would have been the Magic. LeBron and the Cavs would have to win a single hard fought series in the Eastern Conference to reach the Finals, and once there, it would be up to “King James” to lead his team to the promised land. In short, the Cavs window of opportunity would have been wide open had LeBron chose to stay, while the windows of those teams around him would have surely shut within the next year or two.
http://cavaliers.realgm.com/articles/132/20100713/why_lebron_should_have_stayed/
In all fairness, James had every right to leave; after all, he was a free agent. Regardless, Lebron’s departure has clearly left the fans in Cleveland disappointed, and rightfully so. Aside from the fact that James is a superior player than his two new teammates down in Miami, there are other significant factors that differentiate Lebron’s departure from that of Chris Bosh, and Dwyane Wade’s initial contemplation of leaving Miami.
Here are a few reasons why the Cleveland Cavaliers and their fans deserved better from number 23:
1) Cleveland was a Consistent Championship Contender
In the past 4 seasons, the Cavaliers won 222 of a possible 328 regular season games. Their winning percentage of 67.7% over four years is the highest in the league. While the Miami Heat and Toronto Raptors either faced yearly first round eliminations, or failed to qualify for the playoffs altogether, LeBron and the Cavs not only made the playoffs every year, but were consistently considered favorites for the Eastern Conference.
2) Cleveland’s Commitment to Winning via Trades and Signings
Looking at the serious title contenders of the past few years, no team made as many impact player transactions as the Cavaliers. While the Lakers began last summer by essentially swapping Trevor Ariza for Ron Artest, and the Orlando Magic traded for Vince Carter after deciding Hedo Turkoglu wouldn’t be worth the money he would command, the Cleveland front office consistently showed their dedication to winning.
Speaking from a strictly numbers standpoint, the Cavs have either traded for or signed eight players that have been in the rotation since 2008. After the injury plagued season of that year, the Cavaliers swung a deal for Mo Williams, adding another knock down shooter who also happened to be the best point guard that LeBron had ever played with.
Then, months before the 2010 playoffs, the Cavaliers acquired another former All-Star in Antawn Jamison to fill the role of the coveted stretch 4.
In the end, none of these moves were enough to get the Cavs over the hump to win that elusive NBA ring. However, it was not due to a lack of effort from the Cleveland front office.
3) Cleveland Would Have Only Benefited as Time Went On
Now, while the Celtics showed their rejuvenation act in the playoffs this year, even the most die-hard Boston fan cannot deny that they have one, maybe two years left with their current roster before they fall back into mediocrity. Kevin Garnett is already a shell of his former self, Ray Allen’s flat jumper in the Finals revealed the effects of being a 35 shooting guard in the NBA, while Paul Pierce has also shown steady signs of decline. Rajon Rondo’s substantial improvement may keep the team from completely dropping to the bottom of the standings as the older guys phase out.
This means that had LeBron stayed with the Cavs, it would be very possible that as soon as this upcoming season, the only team that would pose a serious threat to them in their conference for the next few years would have been the Magic. LeBron and the Cavs would have to win a single hard fought series in the Eastern Conference to reach the Finals, and once there, it would be up to “King James” to lead his team to the promised land. In short, the Cavs window of opportunity would have been wide open had LeBron chose to stay, while the windows of those teams around him would have surely shut within the next year or two.
http://cavaliers.realgm.com/articles/132/20100713/why_lebron_should_have_stayed/
Related articles by Zemanta
- LeBron: Cavs owner never cared (theglobeandmail.com)
- It's Up To Us: LeBron-less Cavs Are Still a Playoff Contender (bleacherreport.com)
- Fact or Fiction: LeBron James Had to Leave Cleveland to Win an NBA Title (bleacherreport.com)
- Good to be King? LeBron James' Five Worst Moves This Offseason (bleacherreport.com)
- LeBron James and His Fans: Why They're Irritating (bleacherreport.com)
- Heated LeBron has 'a lot of motivation' to beat Cavs (sports.inquirer.net)
- LeBron aims another volley at Cavs owner (search.japantimes.co.jp)
- "New duds: Cleveland Cavaliers unveil new uniforms in post-LeBron era" and related posts (taragana.com)
- LeBron James Says LeBron James is Humble (thehollywoodgossip.com)
- 2010-11 Cleveland Cavaliers Offer New and Unique Challenges For ... (waitingfornextyear.com)
NBA News 2010: Lakers Keep Derek Fisher
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeHe probably shouldn't have had to get on a plane across the country to Miami in order get his deal, but Derek Fisher did finally sign a three-year, $10.5 million contract with the Lakers.
By Fisher's reaction and statements, he seemed to be displeased with the Lakers and talked as if he was doing them a favor out of loyalty and commitment to Kobe Bryant.
"I have decided to continue with Kobe, continue with our teammates and the fans of Los Angeles," said Fisher in a statement. "While this may not be the most lucrative contract I've been offered this off-season, it is the most valuable. I am confident I will continue to lead this team on and off the court. Let the hunt for six begin. . . ."
There were three main risks for the Lakers to potentially let Fisher walk:
1. It would have been demoralizing emotionally, as his intangibles are actually well-documented and well-known. His role in being Kobe Bryant's best friend on the team and the one player than can legitimately challenge him on a personal level creates an improved harmony in the Lakers' locker room.
2. Fisher would have almost certainly signed with a team that would also be competing for a title. The scenario of matching up in a playoff series against Fisher in red and black Heat colors, or another team would have of course provided some awkwardness.
3. Even though they have already signed Steve Blake, the Lakers would have been unable to replace Fisher with anything other than the remaining mid-level (very little left) and the veteran's minimum. They could have conceivably offered Fisher the max, so there should have been no excuse to be outbid. The Lakers certainly took advantage of Fisher's commitment to his teammate and to the franchise as well.
While I'm not sure if Fisher's on-court play deserves the contract he received, his overall contributions certainly get him there. Even if his minutes decrease to the point to where they are virtually nonexistent, at least we know he will contribute in the role of a surrogate coach.
Talking about Fisher's play on the floor, he certainly has declined to the point of being a liability defensively. He gives up a lot in the way of quickness to the NBA's best point guards, but he performed well in the playoffs and generally is not beat by his man in ISOs.
Where teams take advantage of Fisher the most is on the pick-and-roll where his defense is genuinely porous. He also has a difficult time in closing out on perimeter shooters after sagging off into the paint in help.
What is clear on Fisher's production is how well he knows the Triangle and hits clutch jumpers. He doesn't demand excessive shots and he keeps opposing point guards with his ability to stretch the floor and also hit those occasional mid-range jumpers off the glass that he should almost have patented.
The myth of Fisher's clutch shots have possibly been overstated and excessively mythologized over the years, but Phil Jackson and Bryant have a lot of confidence in him to make those shots. Even the threat of Fisher beating him is productive since the reputation demands opposing teams to consider him in late game situations.
Point guard was an issue of concern for the Lakers throughout 09-10 and with Fisher re-signed and Blake now on the roster, it is at least stable. The position will remain a deficiency for the foreseeable future, but it is of course negligible as long as Kobe, Pau, Bynum, Artest and Lamar Odom are healthy.
Grade for Lakers: A-
I Tweeted over the weekend that 50% of Fisher's trip to Miami was to get Doc Jerry Buss to pony up some cash and possibly the other 50% was reconnoissance. Fisher wasn't too pleased that he was forced to get on a plane to meet with LeBron James, Pat Riley and the Heat, but the Lakers must work under the reality of every extra dollar spent counts double because of the luxury tax. Given the probability of Fisher having a sizable role with the Lakers upon his retirement, whether in something as minimal as player development, or potentially as a future head coach, he will be drawing checks with the Lakers' logo on it for many more years beyond the 12-13 season.
Grade for Fisher: B+
http://lakers.realgm.com/articles/159/20100713/grading_the_deal_lakers_keep_derek_fisher/
By Fisher's reaction and statements, he seemed to be displeased with the Lakers and talked as if he was doing them a favor out of loyalty and commitment to Kobe Bryant.
"I have decided to continue with Kobe, continue with our teammates and the fans of Los Angeles," said Fisher in a statement. "While this may not be the most lucrative contract I've been offered this off-season, it is the most valuable. I am confident I will continue to lead this team on and off the court. Let the hunt for six begin. . . ."
There were three main risks for the Lakers to potentially let Fisher walk:
1. It would have been demoralizing emotionally, as his intangibles are actually well-documented and well-known. His role in being Kobe Bryant's best friend on the team and the one player than can legitimately challenge him on a personal level creates an improved harmony in the Lakers' locker room.
2. Fisher would have almost certainly signed with a team that would also be competing for a title. The scenario of matching up in a playoff series against Fisher in red and black Heat colors, or another team would have of course provided some awkwardness.
3. Even though they have already signed Steve Blake, the Lakers would have been unable to replace Fisher with anything other than the remaining mid-level (very little left) and the veteran's minimum. They could have conceivably offered Fisher the max, so there should have been no excuse to be outbid. The Lakers certainly took advantage of Fisher's commitment to his teammate and to the franchise as well.
While I'm not sure if Fisher's on-court play deserves the contract he received, his overall contributions certainly get him there. Even if his minutes decrease to the point to where they are virtually nonexistent, at least we know he will contribute in the role of a surrogate coach.
Talking about Fisher's play on the floor, he certainly has declined to the point of being a liability defensively. He gives up a lot in the way of quickness to the NBA's best point guards, but he performed well in the playoffs and generally is not beat by his man in ISOs.
Where teams take advantage of Fisher the most is on the pick-and-roll where his defense is genuinely porous. He also has a difficult time in closing out on perimeter shooters after sagging off into the paint in help.
What is clear on Fisher's production is how well he knows the Triangle and hits clutch jumpers. He doesn't demand excessive shots and he keeps opposing point guards with his ability to stretch the floor and also hit those occasional mid-range jumpers off the glass that he should almost have patented.
The myth of Fisher's clutch shots have possibly been overstated and excessively mythologized over the years, but Phil Jackson and Bryant have a lot of confidence in him to make those shots. Even the threat of Fisher beating him is productive since the reputation demands opposing teams to consider him in late game situations.
Point guard was an issue of concern for the Lakers throughout 09-10 and with Fisher re-signed and Blake now on the roster, it is at least stable. The position will remain a deficiency for the foreseeable future, but it is of course negligible as long as Kobe, Pau, Bynum, Artest and Lamar Odom are healthy.
Grade for Lakers: A-
I Tweeted over the weekend that 50% of Fisher's trip to Miami was to get Doc Jerry Buss to pony up some cash and possibly the other 50% was reconnoissance. Fisher wasn't too pleased that he was forced to get on a plane to meet with LeBron James, Pat Riley and the Heat, but the Lakers must work under the reality of every extra dollar spent counts double because of the luxury tax. Given the probability of Fisher having a sizable role with the Lakers upon his retirement, whether in something as minimal as player development, or potentially as a future head coach, he will be drawing checks with the Lakers' logo on it for many more years beyond the 12-13 season.
Grade for Fisher: B+
http://lakers.realgm.com/articles/159/20100713/grading_the_deal_lakers_keep_derek_fisher/
Related articles by Zemanta
- Derek Fisher: I'm Staying With The Lakers (huffingtonpost.com)
- Source: Derek Fisher decision expected later Monday (sports.espn.go.com)
- Go Fish: Los Angeles Lakers Must Sign Derek Fisher To Achieve Three-Peat (bleacherreport.com)
- 2010 NBA Finals: Is Derek Fisher the Key to Boston's Success? (bleacherreport.com)
- Familiar Ending: Top Ten Reasons the Lakers will Repeat again this Year (bleacherreport.com)
- Los Angeles Lakers free agent Derek Fisher met LeBron James at Miami airport (sports.espn.go.com)
- NBA Rumors: Should The Lakers Keep Jordan Farmar Or Derek Fisher? (bleacherreport.com)
- Derek Fisher: "Let the Hunt for Six Begin..." (bleacherreport.com)
- Derek Fisher agrees to stay with Lakers (reuters.com)
- Source: Derek Fisher decision expected later Monday (ballhype.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)